This morning I listened to the CBC Radio documentary titled Laws and Mores by Piya Chattopadhyay on CBC’s The Current. I had heard it in May, 2013 when it first aired. At the time I thought it was very fair and very well done. I still do. It’s excellent Radio: CBC at its best. (In case you don’t know me, I am a proud CBC Radio fan.)
This morning, hearing it a second time, I heard a few statements that deserve attention and comment and/or clarification:
I think I heard narrator, Piya Chattopadhyay say that, in the 60’s, between 35,000 and 120,000 abortions were taking place in Canada (not sure how that number is estimated if abortions were illegal). Today the number is estimated at between 100,000 and 130,000 a year. So legalizing contraception has not reduced the number of abortions, confirming the claim that abortions are being used as a contraceptive measure and not to help desperate women who have no other solution to their “problem”. It also may mean that the number of abortions has potentially tripled – so making it “legal” has made it worse. (As an aside, it’s impossible to know the actual number of abortions, because, although they are now “legal” apparently there is no reporting. Not sure why someone has not requested the numbers through the freedom of information act. The numbers must exist because they are paid for by our tax dollars. Another aside: At $500 average each- how many MRI machines would that buy?)
(And another aside: If it’s true that there are some 120,000 abortions a year, that’s about one abortion every five minutes. In the course of the documentary, 5 abortions took place in Canada.)
Also in the documentary, Morgentaler says that he wanted to help women who were pregnant for doing nothing but “having normal sex” (I think that’s the quote). As if pregnancy was not the natural consequence of having normal sex. That’s one of the natural purposes and consequences of sex. Why are people surprised when they get pregnant after having sex? That’s what’s supposed to happen. And it’s a good thing.
And then he said something about women having to “risk their lives”. I understood he meant that pregnancy is risky.
This is a common claim of pro-abortionists. Pregnancy is not risky; not any more than “safe” abortion. Ask Kermit Gosnell’s clients. Ask all the women in the Silent No More Campaign.
And it’s definitely not more of a risk for the unborn child!
At the end of the documentary the reasons for upturning Canada’s abortion law by the Supreme Court in 1988 are clear: In half an hour, it was determined that the law was unconstitutional. It violated Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms infringing on women’s right to life, liberty and personal security. Clearly the other side was not doing anything to make the argument about the unborn child (not sure what the other side was arguing). What about the right to life, liberty and security of the person of the unborn child? That would have been the time to argue in court that personhood (and therefore the rights that all persons have, no matter whether they are born or not-yet-born) begins at conception. (Aside: But it is still a crime in Canada to cause indignity to a human body. Isn’t a human fetus, a human body?) And so here we are, not with abortion being legal (technically), but with no law because politicians are too chicken to “open the debate.”
And, can anyone tell me, what was the logic for abortion being illegal in the first place? Was it not because it was considered murder? And if it was, why wasn’t that the argument? If it wasn’t, then why was abortion a criminal act? Can someone clarify?
Despite what Mr. Morgentaler said to George Stroumboulopoulos on The Hour in 2007 , the abortion debate is not over. I don’t see the laws changing anytime soon and it’s frustrating that what’s plain to me and to alot of people is so hard for others to understand. But don’t fault Mr. Morgentaler. He fought a good fight but he started off with some key false premises, the main one being that a human being is not a human person from the moment of conception.
That’s the heart of the argument.
All I wish is that more Canadians had Morgentaler’s conviction, passion and courage- no matter the reasons- in order to make Canada a better place for all Canadians, especially those who are most vulnerable and who have no one to speak for them.
(Photo courtesy of CNS/Mark Blinch, Reuters)
A reflection on the Solemnity of the Most Holy Trinity, Year B
Deuteronomy 4:32-34, 39-40
Psalm 33 “Blessed the people the Lord has chosen as his heritage”
Romans 8:14-17
Matthew 28:16-20
“I am with you always, to the end of the age.” That has got to be one of my favourite passages of scripture. God is with us always, to the end of the age. That’s good news. If you won’t remember anything that I am going to write, at least remember that.
My name is Pedro, which is Peter in Spanish, and growing up, I was always very proud that my patron was the first Pope, St. Peter. But my middle name is Emmanuel – which means “God with us” – now that’s a special name. I was even more proud of my middle name. I love the idea that God is with us. Our God is not a God who is far away, sitting on a throne in heaven somewhere; our God is a God with us. And that is also good news! Today we celebrate a great feast: Today is the solemnity of the most Holy Trinity. Trinity is a fancy word that means “three” and it refers to the reality that our God is one God, three persons.
God is one God, three persons. It’s not three gods. He’s ONE God: “Hear, Oh Israel, the Lord is God, the Lord is one” (Deut 6:4), three persons. It’s not three aspects of God, or three qualities of God: Creator, redeemer, sanctifier. No, it’s three PERSONS: One God, three persons. It’s hard to understand. That’s why we call it a mystery. But it’s not a mystery like a murder mystery, an Agatha Christie or Scooby Doo mystery that we have to solve. No, when the Church talks about mystery, it means something that’s so amazing, so wonderful that it cannot be fully described in human terms. It cannot be fully understood. It can be partially understood, but never fully. And we use that word, ‘mysteries’ a lot. At Mass you’ll hear the priest speak of “these mysteries that we celebrate”. We also proclaim, “the mystery of faith”. We pray the “Mysteries of the Rosary” and in fact, the word in Greek for sacraments is “mysteries.” So we use that word a lot. And we have a few mysteries: The mystery of the Incarnation, the mystery of the Cross… and the mystery of the Trinity is probably the hardest one to understand: ONE God; THREE persons. But we don’t have to understand it. Still, I think that looking at the Trinity tells us something about the reality of God, about the nature of God, which in turn, because we are made in the image and likeness of God, tells us something about our nature as created human beings.
In the first reading, Moses uses several ways to describe God. There are no words to describe God fully, but throughout scripture people use different images to describe God. Moses describes him in terms of what God does: God is creator, God speaks out of a fire, God saves the nation of Israel. By showing what God has done, Moses shows how awesome God is. But God is not just a God who does. God is a being. God is not a ‘doing’. God is a being and because we are created in the image of God, it means that we are beings as well. We are not human ‘doings’, we are human beings. We are not defined by what we do or by what we are capable of doing; we get our dignity by who we are: Created beings, in the image and likeness of God. But God is also not just a force of nature, or THE FORCE, like in Star Wars. God is not a life force or energy, God is not a concept (despite what John Lennon says); God is a person. You can have a personal relationship with God. God is a person and we too are persons. We are persons from the moment of conception to the moment of natural death. No matter what you have done, no matter whether you are in a coma, or whether you suffer from an intellectual disability, whether you are conscious or not, you are a person. But God is not just A person; God is THREE persons.
Now, this to me makes perfect sense. Think about it: If God is love, then God can’t be alone. You can’t be love in isolation. If God is love, it makes sense that God is a relationship; a community of persons; Father, Son and Holy Spirit. God is a living, dynamic, loving, relationship, community of love between three persons who continually, eternally are outpouring of themselves into each other and receiving the outpouring of each other into themselves. It sounds a bit new age, but it’s true. God is a community. God is relationship. And so, we too are called to relationship. We too are called to community. We too are called to love. God is not just a being, but a “being with”. And that means that we are created to “be with” each other and to “be with” God. That’s what COMMUNION means. And by virtue of our Baptism: Jesus says in the Gospel that we are to baptise “in the name of the Father and the son and the Holy Spirit” – we are baptised into the Trinity – that means that through our baptism we can enter into that loving, inner relationship of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. St. Paul says in the second reading that we are no longer slaves but sons and daughters of God. That means that we are no longer outside of God. No, by virtue of our baptism we can participate INSIDE the life of the trinity; not outside, as slaves, but inside as sons and daughters.
And this is good news. And what a better example of this than when we come to the Eucharist. We receive Christ in Communion. But not just Christ, but the fullness of God: The Father, Son and Holy Spirit. In the Eucharist, God comes to live inside of us and we are brought within God. He abides in us and we abide in Him. That’s pretty cool, ‘cause it means that when we pray to God, we don’t pray to Him from the outside; we pray to God from the inside of God.By virtue of our Baptism and through all the Sacraments, we are able to connect to the very interior life of the Trinity.
So when Jesus says, I am with you always, to the end of the age, he means it. He is God who is a “being with.” He is with us and we are with him; He is within us and we are within Him: the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, always, until the end of the age.
Reflexión para el cuarto domingo de tiempo de Pascua, año C
Lecturas: Hechos 13: 14, 43-52; Apocalipsis 7: 9, 14-17; Juan 10:27-30
Vamos de la semana pasada con un evangelio larguísimo acerca de pescadores, a un evangelio cortito acerca de pastores. Dos profesiones importantes para la gente en los tiempos de Jesús y dos imágenes importantes para nosotros ya que a los apóstoles se les conoce como “pescadores de hombres” y “pastores de almas.”
Hoy es el cuarto domingo de Pascua y tradicionalmente se conoce como el Domingo del Buen Pastor porque el evangelio de hoy, no importa que ciclo sea siempre es parte del discurso de Jesús acerca del Buen Pastor. Acuérdense que hay tres ciclos que duran un año– en el ciclo A leemos el evangelio de Mateo; en el ciclo B leemos el evangelio de Marcos y en el ciclo C, que es en el que estamos este año, leemos el evangelio de Lucas. Pero durante la Pascua siempre se lee el evangelio de Juan. Y el cuarto domingo de Pascua siempre se lee un pedazo del décimo capítulo de Juan, cuando Jesús dice que él es el Buen Pastor.
Read more…
We’re in the second week in Easter and this is the time of the year when we’re thinking about new life and about resurrection, but the reality is that for a lot of people, their day-to-day life has nothing to do with resurrection, as is the case of Halifax mother, Leah Parsons whose 16-year-old daughter Rehtaeh killed herself after being cyber-bullied and humiliated at school following her rape by four of her school-mates.
Read more…
deacon pedro 